Skip to main content

GM Will Rue the Day It Converted Roger Penske From Partner To Competitor

Enduring another endless spasm of "Pursue scale! Eliminate overhead!! Damn the torpedoes!!!" a PPE (that's Prior Place of Employment to you newer readers) closed a nearby primary care practice in favor of a larger practice two towns over.

To the extent there was ANY rationality behind the decision, several theories appeared to apply: (1) solo practice is an expensive, uncompetitive model of organizing a medical practice, and (2) consumers would happily do what they're told even if it meant driving 30 minutes through grinding suburban traffic to see another PPE-branded doctor.

Both theories were quickly proved wrong. What was proven right (again) is the notion that markets are local - one service provider, one customer, a loyal dyad.

Some physicians prefer practicing solo, are good at it and don't mind the drawbacks, which can be substantial. So it was with this doc. He left us, established another solo practice nearby, joined our competitor's medical staff and prospered. Oops. The PPE hadn't seen that coming.

And only a few patients transferred to the new, larger practice. The PPE watched and fretted as their market share in several key zip codes dropped off a cliff. Yikes. Didn't expect that either.

I'm not resurrecting an old debate here just to say "Nyah Nyah I was right!" (Even though I was...) No, I wonder how many of the same mistakes are being repeated by GM and Chrysler right now, as dealers and brands are sacrificed on the alter of overhead reduction.

Today, GM announced the sale of the Saturn brand to the Penske dealership chain. Roger Penske hasn't done much in life - from racing cars to running large companies - that hasn't worked out. He knows cars, he's well-respected, smart and tough - everything GM ought to fear in a competitor.

According to today's New York Times:
"'Saturn was kind of an unpolished gem at GM,'' said Brad Coulter, director at the Bloomfield Hills, Mich., turnaround firm O'Keefe and Associates. ''They had never really fully exploited what they developed. Saturn is known for having some of the best-run dealerships. The brand is highly rated. It's a top-notch sales organization.'''
So Penske's buying "...best run" dealerships, a "highly rated" brand and a "top-notch" sales organization. Sounds like those are the assets GM should be keeping, not selling.

I'll make a prediction: after three years under Penske's leadership, Saturn will be outperforming GM on most measures of corporate success. And the investment bankers on President Obama's auto task force will say "Gee, we never saw THAT coming!"

The Takeaway: Any idiot can slash overhead, and every day another idiot proves my point. Seeing beyond Wall Street's spreadsheet models and MBA mantras requires a rare degree of strategic subtlety, a finely-attuned ear for consumer feedback, a restless mind - a mind open to other scenarios and possibilities and, finally, an awareness of the post-slashing end game.

More of my ramblings about remaking the auto industry, here.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcare

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer. In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers."  Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings. $2.4 billion saved