Skip to main content

Does Your Strategy Account For the Future?

"Your rearview mirror is so small and your windshield is so large because what lies ahead is much more important than the past." (@CHRISVOSS)

What can we say about the future? 
  • It's uncertain and the end is always near. (Jim Morrison) 
  • The future is much like the present, only longer.  (Dan Quisenberry) 
  • The future is here.  It's just not widely distributed yet. (William Gibson) 
Uncertain. As near as tomorrow. Long duration.  Limited (and uneven) distribution.

Think about how hospital strategic plans account for future competitor decisions.   If they do at all,  it's little more than simple extrapolation of past performance, a technique which, though understandable since that's where the data reside, is nothing more than crafting strategy in a vacuum.
It's much easier to track competitor performance retrospectively than to forecast future decisions.

Volume trends, market share, patient satisfaction, quality indicators, financial performance, major capital investments are all in the public domain if one knows where to look.  A strategist's job is to synthesize all that data so that a few important, future-oriented questions receive sustained attention:

1. The Benchmark Question: 
What is our competitive position relative to the competition?

2. The Trendline Question:
Are we improving? I.e. what's the slope of our trend line? How do we know?

3. The Speed To Market Question:
Are we improving as rapidly as those around us? Are our improvement cycle times fast enough?

4. The Marketplace Expectations Question:
Are we improving as rapidly as the market demands, now and in the future? I.e. is our projected performance sufficient to succeed as customer expectations grow and evolve?


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor...

gapingvoid cartoon #378

Buy your own, here.

"An Affordable Fix For Modernizing Medical Records"

...from the Veterans Health Administration and Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital. I know enough about my own strengths and weaknesses to know that I'm no IT expert. But I am acutely interested in examples of people and teams thinking differently to solve long-standing, intractable problems and, for better or worse, there are lots of those to be found in the IT realm. Yesterday, it was a story about a team adding iPhone portability to MEDITECH functionality, delivering to harried physicians better access to clinical data and more productive hours in every work day. (Wow. Apple in the boardroom AND the physician lounge. Has to be an IT traditionalist's worst nightmare. But I digress...) Today, the Wall Street Journal features a story about Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital finding an affordable, open-source alternative to proprietary EMR systems : "In the push to digitize America's hospitals, Midland Memorial faced an all-too-common dilemma: a crying need for information ...