Skip to main content

"I underestimated how much that cost would affect my behavior."

Says a patient quoted in this NY Times article about how recession-strapped consumers are shopping more carefully for their health care needs.  Health care was once thought to be recession-resistant.  No more, says the article;
"Even with a halting economic recovery, doctors and others say many people are still extremely budget-conscious, signaling the possibility of a fundamental change in Americans’ appetite for health care."

[...]

"(Dr. Jim King, a family practice physician in rural Tennessee) said patients were also being more thoughtful about their needs. Fewer are asking for an MRI as soon as they have a bad headache. “People are realizing that this is my money, even if I’m not writing a check,” he said.
In this mix are undoubtedly some consumers deferring care that is appropriate and necessary for their long-term health.  That may change as the economy approaches something nearer 'normal'  - whatever that is these days.

But beyond that, is this shift 'fundamental' as the Times says?  Fundamental has a sense of staying power, of permanence transcending economic cycles.  I'd answer with a hearty 'yes' even though the new behaviors took root in economic desperation.

As this story about my own spending habits illustrates, I tend to think we consumers have become more careful, skeptical shoppers.  We're arming ourselves with research and information, questioning options and alternatives, seeking-out other opinions.  True, these trends were underway pre-meltdown but haven't we been advised not to waste a good crisis?  So let's not waste this one.

Let's keep consumers engaged and questioning, supplied with actionable, timely information, treating them with some long-overdue respect.  Truly 'bending the health care cost curve downward' depends on it.  It's a brave new world and welcome to it, K-Mart shoppers, physicians and hospital CEOs everywhere.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor...

gapingvoid cartoon #378

Buy your own, here.

"An Affordable Fix For Modernizing Medical Records"

...from the Veterans Health Administration and Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital. I know enough about my own strengths and weaknesses to know that I'm no IT expert. But I am acutely interested in examples of people and teams thinking differently to solve long-standing, intractable problems and, for better or worse, there are lots of those to be found in the IT realm. Yesterday, it was a story about a team adding iPhone portability to MEDITECH functionality, delivering to harried physicians better access to clinical data and more productive hours in every work day. (Wow. Apple in the boardroom AND the physician lounge. Has to be an IT traditionalist's worst nightmare. But I digress...) Today, the Wall Street Journal features a story about Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital finding an affordable, open-source alternative to proprietary EMR systems : "In the push to digitize America's hospitals, Midland Memorial faced an all-too-common dilemma: a crying need for information ...