Skip to main content

Continuously Improving Communications

A few years ago I decided to conduct a readership survey of the audiences - employees, physicians and volunteers -  for my internal newsletters.  At the time, much like you probably do, we published all sorts of content about important-sounding decisions, committees and strategies.  It was important to us, ergo it was important to them.

Can you guess what we found?  Volunteers paid a little attention, physicians almost none.  (Of course we were soon producing an equally-ignored physicians' newsletter...another story for another day.)  Employees tuned in mainly for...the cafeteria menus!  Yikes!  But we learned some important lessons and got better.  So can you.
  • What questions are you asking to foster continuous improvement in your communications strategy?  
  • Are you building metrics around the answers to those questions? 
  • Do you have technology in place to generate the data to drive the metrics?

What questions SHOULD you ask to listen, learn and improve? A modest list, in no particular order;
  • Does your audience consider your content a "must read?"
  • Would it be missed if it went away?
  • Is anybody reading? Who is and who isn't? What differentiates the two groups?
  • Are you publishing the right content?  How do you know?
  • In the right format?
  • Is the content considered credible and trustworthy? Timely? (A monthly internal newsletter runs the risk of being out of date by the time it's published. Informal networks, gossip and rumor always work faster than official channels. Not that it SHOULD be that way.)
  • What should you do more of?  Less of?
  • Are you interactive enough? Multi-media enough?
  • Should you incorporate more social media? How?
  • Should you enable RSS feeds and let your audience assemble their own content, deciding for themselves what's important?
  • Is your content easy to share, like, tweet and recommend?  Or does that prospect freak you out?
  • Do you ever survey readers? How? What have you learned?
  • Are your efforts working in a vacuum?  Or do they mutually reinforce messages heard every day, every shift, from leaders throughout the organization?
Paraphrasing David Ogilvy, people read what interests them. Sometimes that's an employee newsletter.

What have I missed?  Leave a comment or suggestion.  Thanks!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcare

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer. In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers."  Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings. $2.4 billion saved