Skip to main content

Open Source Funding, From Mark Cuban

Mark Cuban, occasional loudmouth, frequent blogger and full-time owner of the NBA's Dallas Mavericks, offers a unique opportunity to all those out there with a business idea seeking funding:
"...looking for an idea that hopefully could inspire people to create businesses that could quickly become self funding. Businesses that just needed a jump start to get the ball rolling and create jobs. Im a big believer that entrepreneurs will lead us out of this mess. I just needed a way to help.

"So here it is. Some people will love it, some will hate it. It is what it is.

"You must post your business plan here on my blog where I expect other people can and will comment on it. I also expect that other people will steal the idea and use it elsewhere. That is the idea. Call this an open source funding environment.

"If its a good idea and worth funding, we want it replicated elsewhere. The idea is not just to help you, but to figure out how to help the economy through hard work and ingenuity. If you come up with the idea and get funding, you have a head start. If you execute better than others, you could possibly make money at it. As you will see from the rules below, these are going to be businesses that are mostly driven by sweat equity."
Yes, Cuban wants your business idea. He might even consider funding it. Post it on his web site and see what happens, but be prepared to work harder than you ever thought possible.

Imagine what you could do by applying Cuban's open-source idea to your own organization. Create an innovation challenge and a few rules, post them on your corporate intranet (hmmm...using the intranet for something besides cafeteria menus...what a concept!) and see what happens.

Business development would no longer be the exclusive purview of the executive suite or a few favored physicians. Ideas might be offered far outside the usual "Let's develop cardiology and oncology and another outpatient MRI center..." box. Suddenly you'd have hundreds of people "ideating" instead of a few.

And feedback? Think about it...you'd create an instant referendum on an idea's merits. Now-voiceless people from all corners of your organization could suddenly FIND their voice, offering suggestions, feedback, comments, analysis and support.

And just as Cuban quickly discovered, you'd also give voice to cranks and naysayers, probably a few idiots and certainly those too arrogant to appreciate the democratization of ideas. That's OK too. Open-source means their voices move from "controlling" to just a few among many. They'll finally get drowned out and marginalized - which is, of course, where they belong and the point of open-source.

Here are 999 free-for-the-taking business ideas to jump-start your thinking. (Thanks to Seth Godin for the heads-up.)


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor
Post a Comment
Read more

"An Affordable Fix For Modernizing Medical Records"

...from the Veterans Health Administration and Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital. I know enough about my own strengths and weaknesses to know that I'm no IT expert. But I am acutely interested in examples of people and teams thinking differently to solve long-standing, intractable problems and, for better or worse, there are lots of those to be found in the IT realm. Yesterday, it was a story about a team adding iPhone portability to MEDITECH functionality, delivering to harried physicians better access to clinical data and more productive hours in every work day. (Wow. Apple in the boardroom AND the physician lounge. Has to be an IT traditionalist's worst nightmare. But I digress...) Today, the Wall Street Journal features a story about Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital finding an affordable, open-source alternative to proprietary EMR systems : "In the push to digitize America's hospitals, Midland Memorial faced an all-too-common dilemma: a crying need for information
3 comments
Read more

Are the "Apocaholics" Wrong?

Will society avoid collapse and continue prospering? Yes, thanks to the innovators among us says zoologist and Economist editor Matt Ridley in his new book "The Rational Optimist." "...with new hubs of innovation emerging elsewhere, and with ideas spreading faster than ever on the Internet, (expect) bottom-up innovators to prevail. (Ridley's) prediction for the rest of the century: “Prosperity spreads, technology progresses, poverty declines, disease retreats, fecundity falls, happiness increases, violence atrophies, freedom grows, knowledge flourishes, the environment improves and wilderness expands.” We could still screw things up.  We could, for example, stifle innovation and trade while inflating the importance of restrictive bureaucracies. "Our progress is unsustainable...only if we stifle innovation and trade, the way China and other empires did in the past. Is that possible? Well, European countries are already banning technologies based on the preca
2 comments
Read more