Skip to main content

Zagat Comes To Health Care...

...and, predictably, physicians hate the idea of being rated like, well, restaurants and hotels. Eeek!
"Arthur Caplan, director of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania, said he was skeptical about open forums evaluating doctors.

“There is no correlation between a doctor being an inept danger to the patient and his popularity,” Professor Caplan said. Reviewing doctors is “a recipe for disaster,” he said."
I'm not sure consumers are all that good at evaluating bacteria counts in restaurant kitchens or fire-safety systems in hotels either, and yet somehow life goes on...as will this debate.

Meanwhile, web entrepreneur James Currier is developing Medpedia, a free, online medical encyclopedia. Contributors will be limited to trained medical professionals, probably one reason this effort is garnering significant support from the medical community.
"(Currier...) has high hopes for the potential of the service to revitalize attitudes toward health care. Patients need to take more active roles in the health care process, he said, which is why he wants to eventually add procedural guides to help patients prepare for surgeries and treatments, recommended questions for patients to ask their doctors, average procedural costs and informational videos. Medpedia will also contain debate pages housed separately from the neutral information pages. That way, physicians can engage in academic dialogues about hot issues such as whether or not local drinking water should be supplemented with folic acid...

"Medpedia could also play a role in revamping the physician referral system. The site has a built-in social networking directory modeled after LinkedIn for medical professionals to help patients get a broader view of specialists in their geographical areas."
Currier sees an entire new generation of Web 2.0-savvy physicians emerging onto the scene, and figures they - and their patients - will be comfortable tapping into the power of the collective.

I think he's right and it's nice to see someone acting on a belief that health care consumers possess at least some basic level of decision-making ability. Striking a blow against the pervasive "patients are nitwits" philosophy is always a good thing.

UPDATE: Paul Levy continues the discussion over at "Running A Hospital."


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor
Post a Comment
Read more

"An Affordable Fix For Modernizing Medical Records"

...from the Veterans Health Administration and Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital. I know enough about my own strengths and weaknesses to know that I'm no IT expert. But I am acutely interested in examples of people and teams thinking differently to solve long-standing, intractable problems and, for better or worse, there are lots of those to be found in the IT realm. Yesterday, it was a story about a team adding iPhone portability to MEDITECH functionality, delivering to harried physicians better access to clinical data and more productive hours in every work day. (Wow. Apple in the boardroom AND the physician lounge. Has to be an IT traditionalist's worst nightmare. But I digress...) Today, the Wall Street Journal features a story about Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital finding an affordable, open-source alternative to proprietary EMR systems : "In the push to digitize America's hospitals, Midland Memorial faced an all-too-common dilemma: a crying need for information
3 comments
Read more

Are the "Apocaholics" Wrong?

Will society avoid collapse and continue prospering? Yes, thanks to the innovators among us says zoologist and Economist editor Matt Ridley in his new book "The Rational Optimist." "...with new hubs of innovation emerging elsewhere, and with ideas spreading faster than ever on the Internet, (expect) bottom-up innovators to prevail. (Ridley's) prediction for the rest of the century: “Prosperity spreads, technology progresses, poverty declines, disease retreats, fecundity falls, happiness increases, violence atrophies, freedom grows, knowledge flourishes, the environment improves and wilderness expands.” We could still screw things up.  We could, for example, stifle innovation and trade while inflating the importance of restrictive bureaucracies. "Our progress is unsustainable...only if we stifle innovation and trade, the way China and other empires did in the past. Is that possible? Well, European countries are already banning technologies based on the preca
2 comments
Read more