Skip to main content
Forecast for retail clinics: heading upwards.  Writing in Hospitals & Health Networks magazine, David Ellis surveys the retail clinic landscape and finds reasons for optimism:
"If a growing market demand for primary and geriatric care, a dwindling supply of primary and geriatric care, and a growing retail clinic industry are not enough to persuade anyone that there may be some correlations here, consider that so far there have been no retail clinic patient horror stories, that the little data published to date indicate that retail clinics are delivering high-quality care, and that hospital systems are slowly but surely getting into the business themselves. The reasonable conclusion is that the retail clinic, if not “very sound,” at least deserves a passing grade."
And now pharmacy giant Walgreens is moving the concept into another niche: worksite clinics.
"One work-site clinic, which has served a 60-employee company for three years and five hours a week, charges employees and their family members nothing for visits, drugs or labs. The company saves money because its employees and family members receive primary care when they need it, thereby avoiding downstream costs from compounded health problems." (emphasis mine.)
Ellis find the concept "disruptive" and a threat to traditional health care providers. That may actually understate the situation.  It's hard to compete with "free."

Recently, I was part of an RFP response team developing the worksite clinic concept for a major Midwest food products company.  Our experience and data agree with Ellis's: the economic benefits are compelling, even for a small company. Watch this trend.  A new model of primary care is emerging.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor

"An Affordable Fix For Modernizing Medical Records"

...from the Veterans Health Administration and Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital. I know enough about my own strengths and weaknesses to know that I'm no IT expert. But I am acutely interested in examples of people and teams thinking differently to solve long-standing, intractable problems and, for better or worse, there are lots of those to be found in the IT realm. Yesterday, it was a story about a team adding iPhone portability to MEDITECH functionality, delivering to harried physicians better access to clinical data and more productive hours in every work day. (Wow. Apple in the boardroom AND the physician lounge. Has to be an IT traditionalist's worst nightmare. But I digress...) Today, the Wall Street Journal features a story about Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital finding an affordable, open-source alternative to proprietary EMR systems : "In the push to digitize America's hospitals, Midland Memorial faced an all-too-common dilemma: a crying need for information

Are the "Apocaholics" Wrong?

Will society avoid collapse and continue prospering? Yes, thanks to the innovators among us says zoologist and Economist editor Matt Ridley in his new book "The Rational Optimist." "...with new hubs of innovation emerging elsewhere, and with ideas spreading faster than ever on the Internet, (expect) bottom-up innovators to prevail. (Ridley's) prediction for the rest of the century: “Prosperity spreads, technology progresses, poverty declines, disease retreats, fecundity falls, happiness increases, violence atrophies, freedom grows, knowledge flourishes, the environment improves and wilderness expands.” We could still screw things up.  We could, for example, stifle innovation and trade while inflating the importance of restrictive bureaucracies. "Our progress is unsustainable...only if we stifle innovation and trade, the way China and other empires did in the past. Is that possible? Well, European countries are already banning technologies based on the preca