Skip to main content
Forecast for retail clinics: heading upwards.  Writing in Hospitals & Health Networks magazine, David Ellis surveys the retail clinic landscape and finds reasons for optimism:
"If a growing market demand for primary and geriatric care, a dwindling supply of primary and geriatric care, and a growing retail clinic industry are not enough to persuade anyone that there may be some correlations here, consider that so far there have been no retail clinic patient horror stories, that the little data published to date indicate that retail clinics are delivering high-quality care, and that hospital systems are slowly but surely getting into the business themselves. The reasonable conclusion is that the retail clinic, if not “very sound,” at least deserves a passing grade."
And now pharmacy giant Walgreens is moving the concept into another niche: worksite clinics.
"One work-site clinic, which has served a 60-employee company for three years and five hours a week, charges employees and their family members nothing for visits, drugs or labs. The company saves money because its employees and family members receive primary care when they need it, thereby avoiding downstream costs from compounded health problems." (emphasis mine.)
Ellis find the concept "disruptive" and a threat to traditional health care providers. That may actually understate the situation.  It's hard to compete with "free."

Recently, I was part of an RFP response team developing the worksite clinic concept for a major Midwest food products company.  Our experience and data agree with Ellis's: the economic benefits are compelling, even for a small company. Watch this trend.  A new model of primary care is emerging.  


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcare

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer. In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers."  Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings. $2.4 billion saved