Skip to main content

"From small things momma...

...big things one day come!"  says the gospel according to Dave Edmunds.  

So, I'm thinking: is that gospel at work in the housing market?  Beyond the things we're all painful aware of  - the rampant speculation, mortgages given to people with no hope of paying the money back, toxic assets securitized and resold several times - could there also be a small thing at work here, a little gospel spark causing a big conflagration?

The spark, of course, being the crackdown on immigration, legal or otherwise. Think about it.  Regardless of your attitudes toward immigrants, housing depends on a ready supply of new homeowners moving in at the market's low end.  Those starter homeowners trade up as their incomes rise and economic confidence improves.  And their "trading up" supports the next highest ranks of homeowners and so on and so on, up the chain it goes.

The housing market may need those "trader-uppers" more than it thinks.  It's the "trickle-up" theory of economics in action.

Immigrants pursuing the American dream create demand for houses.  More demand causes prices to stabilize.  Stable prices improve security values.  Improved security values means fewer toxic assets.  Fewer toxic assets...well, you get the picture.

Oh yeah, I think increased immigration could help solve the Social Security funding problem, too.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor

"An Affordable Fix For Modernizing Medical Records"

...from the Veterans Health Administration and Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital. I know enough about my own strengths and weaknesses to know that I'm no IT expert. But I am acutely interested in examples of people and teams thinking differently to solve long-standing, intractable problems and, for better or worse, there are lots of those to be found in the IT realm. Yesterday, it was a story about a team adding iPhone portability to MEDITECH functionality, delivering to harried physicians better access to clinical data and more productive hours in every work day. (Wow. Apple in the boardroom AND the physician lounge. Has to be an IT traditionalist's worst nightmare. But I digress...) Today, the Wall Street Journal features a story about Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital finding an affordable, open-source alternative to proprietary EMR systems : "In the push to digitize America's hospitals, Midland Memorial faced an all-too-common dilemma: a crying need for information

Are the "Apocaholics" Wrong?

Will society avoid collapse and continue prospering? Yes, thanks to the innovators among us says zoologist and Economist editor Matt Ridley in his new book "The Rational Optimist." "...with new hubs of innovation emerging elsewhere, and with ideas spreading faster than ever on the Internet, (expect) bottom-up innovators to prevail. (Ridley's) prediction for the rest of the century: “Prosperity spreads, technology progresses, poverty declines, disease retreats, fecundity falls, happiness increases, violence atrophies, freedom grows, knowledge flourishes, the environment improves and wilderness expands.” We could still screw things up.  We could, for example, stifle innovation and trade while inflating the importance of restrictive bureaucracies. "Our progress is unsustainable...only if we stifle innovation and trade, the way China and other empires did in the past. Is that possible? Well, European countries are already banning technologies based on the preca