Skip to main content

An Innovation Video From C.K. Prahalad

What if...? Why not...? Medically indigent or market opportunities?

What if everything you knew about the world's poor was wrong? What if you re-framed the issue instead of thinking about them as 'someone else's problem' (assuming you thought of them at all?) What if you cast off old notions about global poverty and discarded shop-worn solutions? What if everywhere you looked, you saw, not problems, but challenges to innovate?

Here's a short Fast Company video featuring C.K. Prahalad discussing GE's development of a new, lighter, cheaper EKG machine...




Why not apply the same thinking to YOUR community's indigent care 'problem?' Why not take a blank sheet of paper, cast off everything you know about health care as 'big business' and unlearn all you know about spider webs of regulation and strangling systems of guilds and castes?

Why not, for a moment, ignore that thick binder of policies and procedures, the attitude of 'we're so smart we must know best...'? Why not design something centered around human beings...something that might turn YOUR indigent care 'problem' into a new market 'opportunity?'

4 billion people around the world are considered 'poor.' GE went to rural India and found innovation-driven new markets. You may just need to go around the block.

(P.S. The video opens with a Comcast commercial. Ignore it. I hate them.)


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor
Post a Comment
Read more

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcare
Post a Comment
Read more

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer. In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers."  Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings. $2.4 billion saved
Post a Comment
Read more