Skip to main content

6 (Specious) Arguments Against Social Media In Health Care

From Junto - A Gathering Of Marketing Professionals, here are the most common arguments against social media in health care:
"Social media opens the door for a HIPAA violation."
"No control over what people will say about us."
"There's no return on investment."
"People don't go online when picking healthcare providers."
"Our doctors don't care about social media."
"Everyone will be on Facebook instead of working."

"These roadblocks are, with few exceptions, categorically false.
The article calls health care "notorious for being 5-7 years behind the curve for marketing and communications innovation."  I think that's being kind.  15-20 years is more like it.

Why so far behind the curve?
  • Few hospital CEOs demand ROI accountability from the marketing team.  Fewer still mean it when they say it, enough to get out of the way and let it happen.
  • For many CFOs, marketing is little more than a "slush fund" to be tolerated when times are good and slashed the minute times get challenging.
  • And it's not uncommon to hear a physician opine that "people don't go online to pick a provider" when what they really mean is "I don't go online and don't understand why anybody else would either..."  Here again, CEOs often take the path of least resistance.
  • And it takes an intrepid, confident marketer to say "Yes, there IS a return on investment and I'll stake my job on it!  And I'll prove that physician wrong!"
Above all, I think the control issue is paramount.  A generation of physicians and hospital CEOs built careers and a sense of power from being in charge of the conversation. Social media democratizes all of that - the information, the discussions and, yes, the power.

What they're missing, I think, is that these social media conversations occur with or without them, just like they always have over the back fence, at PTA meetings and in the stands at kiddie soccer.  So if they're occuring anyway, isn't it better to have a voice, to be part of the conversation instead of an ignorant, listening-impaired bystander?

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor
Post a Comment
Read more

"An Affordable Fix For Modernizing Medical Records"

...from the Veterans Health Administration and Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital. I know enough about my own strengths and weaknesses to know that I'm no IT expert. But I am acutely interested in examples of people and teams thinking differently to solve long-standing, intractable problems and, for better or worse, there are lots of those to be found in the IT realm. Yesterday, it was a story about a team adding iPhone portability to MEDITECH functionality, delivering to harried physicians better access to clinical data and more productive hours in every work day. (Wow. Apple in the boardroom AND the physician lounge. Has to be an IT traditionalist's worst nightmare. But I digress...) Today, the Wall Street Journal features a story about Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital finding an affordable, open-source alternative to proprietary EMR systems : "In the push to digitize America's hospitals, Midland Memorial faced an all-too-common dilemma: a crying need for information
3 comments
Read more

Are the "Apocaholics" Wrong?

Will society avoid collapse and continue prospering? Yes, thanks to the innovators among us says zoologist and Economist editor Matt Ridley in his new book "The Rational Optimist." "...with new hubs of innovation emerging elsewhere, and with ideas spreading faster than ever on the Internet, (expect) bottom-up innovators to prevail. (Ridley's) prediction for the rest of the century: “Prosperity spreads, technology progresses, poverty declines, disease retreats, fecundity falls, happiness increases, violence atrophies, freedom grows, knowledge flourishes, the environment improves and wilderness expands.” We could still screw things up.  We could, for example, stifle innovation and trade while inflating the importance of restrictive bureaucracies. "Our progress is unsustainable...only if we stifle innovation and trade, the way China and other empires did in the past. Is that possible? Well, European countries are already banning technologies based on the preca
2 comments
Read more