Skip to main content

The Bigger They Are...

Interesting juxtaposition of marketing impressions during today's travels. First, a billboard from a large health system (full disclosure: a prior place of employment) advertising robotic surgery. I formed several opinions during the 1.64 seconds the billboard was in view.

From least-worst to most:

Questionable: a marketing tactic based on the theory (if the word 'theory' isn't granting too much credit) that motorists speeding down one of Chicago's busiest expressways really care about having their prostate reamed robotically. Personally, I'm not persuaded.

Worse: the billboard's profusion of words, typefaces, fonts, logos and images. So many as to be confusing and, ultimately, ineffective.

Utterly wretched: the copy's light yellow colors on a white background. Hard to read in the daylight and nearly invisible under sodium vapor lights at night. Who does yellow on white billboards anyway?

All in all, a nice way to waste $100k plus the agency's commission.

Next was a meeting with a prospective client, a health care professional who truly values marketing as an investment in growing his practice. Great ideas and a willingness to try new things, all with a clear ROI focus. A decent budget but not enough to invest in "shoot yourself in the foot" tactics. No money wasted. Every dollar pulls its weight. And nary a hint of "I'll let my agency do my thinking for me."

Ever notice how the correlation between marketing acumen and organizational size is frequently inverse?

Comments

Shereen said…
But don't those billboards make the board members feel good?

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcare

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer. In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers."  Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings. $2.4 billion saved