Skip to main content

"We're In The 99th Percentile Of Customer Satisfaction!"

According to The American Customer Satisfaction Index, hospitals' customer satisfaction ranks no better than middle of the pack, slightly ahead of energy utilities and the U.S. Postal Service, and well behind major appliances and pet food manufacturers.

So what does a hospital saying "We're in the 99th percentile...!" really mean? Usually, it means "We scored pretty well within some peer group." Ah, a peer group. There's the rub.

Hospitals are great at benchmarking themselves against other hospitals. It's like 14th century astronomy, where the entire universe consisted of the few thousand objects in the night sky visible to the naked eye. It was easy to believe that nothing else existed, certainly nothing that mattered.

But if our "peers" are other hospitals in our health care universe maybe we should set our sights a little higher, adjusting for the fact that, across all industries and the full range of consumer experiences, none of us rise very far above average. How does that 99th percentile feel now?

I can hear the branding tag lines now: "We're the best of a bad lot!" Or, "We're no worse than anybody else!" (As a fan of truth in advertising, I like that last one.)

But since when is competitive advantage built from doing things a LITTLE better than our peer group? Why not do what nobody else IS doing, or better yet, what nobody else CAN do? How about building a new, best-in-class-anywhere peer group as we redefine an industry? Is it any wonder hospitals spend so much time talking about "competitive advantage" and have so little to show for it?

The ACSI's top-ranked industry is "Personal Care and Cleaning Products." What are their processes? What do they know that we don't? What are they doing that we're not? What do they understand about customers that we've missed? I don't know and you probably don't either. I do know that "competitive advantage" is built on finding out.

Now you know why so few hospitals talk publicly about their patient satisfaction scores. It's hard to spin "we're at the top end of mediocrity" even for the most seasoned of PR flacks.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcare

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer. In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers."  Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings. $2.4 billion saved