Skip to main content

Radiation Therapy: The Crisis Continues

More from the New York Times on radiation safety (or the lack thereof.)  This time it's Evanston (IL) Hospital and problems involving three patients during identical stereotactic radiosurgery procedures.

Investigators found problems that should have been obvious to the rankest six sigma newbie.   Poorly-designed trays and mounts that interfere with an operator's ability to verify settings.  The need to "trick" the machine into thinking it was doing one thing when it was really doing something far more dangerous.  Complex components from multiple vendors, all kludged together.  Moving data from one computer to another and then to a third, each hand-off a failure waiting to happen. 

Says the article;
"(The) system is supposed to work this way: A treatment plan is developed on one computer, then transferred into another software system that, among other things, verifies that the treatment plan matches the doctor’s prescription. The data is then sent to a third computer that controls the linear accelerator."
Equipment manufacturer Varian offered a "...decidedly low-tech solution: a decal (!) to stick on the machines, warning operators to be extra careful in setting the radiation field."   Good grief.

Similar problems occurred at CoxHealth in Springfield, MO and at a hospital in Toulouse, France, yet  the lack of a central database for reporting errors hampered any information-sharing that might have prevented the harmful cascade.

And though a software fix has been issued, so far only 75% of affected machines have incorporated the fix.  What's wrong with the other 25%, I wonder?  Too busy meeting budget?

More on the subject of radiation safety from Steve Davis, Health Care Strategist:

Radiation Safety and Trust As A Business Strategy.

1 In 20 Radiation Therapy Patients Will Suffer Injuries.


Popular posts from this blog

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcar…

Becoming Consumer Friendly In Five Easy Steps...Or Not

An article at offers hospitals 5 steps to becoming more consumer friendly.

If you still think there's a secret sauce to your hospital becoming more "consumer friendly," these 5 steps are as good a place to start as any.  Unfortunately, it's a little like that old Steve Martin comedy bit where he says he'll teach you how to be rich. The first step is to go find a million dollars.

Step 1 from the article is realizing that "...a Medicare beneficiary with chronic conditions is different from a young mom who brings her kids in for an annual check-up." This is market segmentation for beginners, and, yes, one size decidedly does not fit all. I'm sure your marketing team's been saying this for a while.

Steps 2-5: have a strategy, metrics, a champion and resources. OK. Hard to argue with any of those.

But those things, alone or together, won't overcome culture. They're important components to be sure, but insufficient without a …

Behind Every Resume Is A Potential Customer...and Karma.

I recently heard from an executive colleague who, thanks to a merger, found herself looking for her next opportunity. Her story, probably depressingly familiar to many of you, was all about the big black hole of rudeness and non-responsiveness that so often sums up employers' attitudes toward candidates.

This colleague, thinking she'd see the healthcare world from a new vantage point, pursued opportunities with consultants, IT vendors, architects and other suppliers who, far from appreciating her solid resume, were like the 3 Stooges of clueless.

So back to a senior health system role she went, WHERE SHE NOW INITIATES AND MANAGES RFPs FOR SOME OF THE VERY SAME COMPANIES who wouldn't talk to her as a candidate, but profess their LOVE for her now that she's got money to spend on their services.

Not gonna happen. Any guesses who's off the RFP list?

I smiled when I heard her story, imagining the BusDev people working hard to grow the revenue pipeline, all the while b…