Skip to main content

The Battle Over Hospitals' Tax-Exempt Status Heats Up In Illinois

Chicago News Cooperative:  "State Challenges Hospitals' Tax Breaks."
“Hospitals think they should get tax exemptions for merely what they do in the community,” said John Colombo, a professor of law at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign who has followed the issue of nonprofit hospital tax exemptions nationally. “It’s problematic: The overall number that each of these hospitals is reporting is abysmally low. Given the state of the economy, one would expect the charity services going up.”
“Hospitals aren’t poorhouses anymore,” (says Colombo.)  “Just because they were exempt in 1900 doesn’t mean they should be exempt in 2011. The world is different.”
Yes, the world is different in 2011, especially when for-profit Vanguard Health Systems can buy 4 hospitals in the Chicago area, pay taxes AND deliver charity care in amounts "not materially different" from their tax-exempt, not-for-profit competitors.

I don't think anybody (even Illinois' tax authorities) begrudges a "no margin, no mission" mindset.  But to my NFP brethren in Illinois, I'll simply say this: if you wish to be thought of as a charity, then act charitably. 

In case you're unclear on the concept, let's return to the source - Merriam-Webster:

Char-i-ty.  A noun, meaning (1) benevolent goodwill toward or love of humanity, or (2) generosity and helpfulness, especially toward the needy or suffering.

The more you act like any other business (even one that just happens to deliver a social good like health care) the more you'll be treated like any other business.  That is to say rudely, at arms' length and  'just show me the money.'   But fair's fair since that's pretty much how indigent patients feel leaving your ER.

One percent of revenues devoted to charity care?  I'm not sure where lies the tipping point between business and charity, but c'mon.  That falls on the side of  'caught red-handed.'

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcar…

Becoming Consumer Friendly In Five Easy Steps...Or Not

An article at hhnmag.com offers hospitals 5 steps to becoming more consumer friendly.

If you still think there's a secret sauce to your hospital becoming more "consumer friendly," these 5 steps are as good a place to start as any.  Unfortunately, it's a little like that old Steve Martin comedy bit where he says he'll teach you how to be rich. The first step is to go find a million dollars.

Step 1 from the article is realizing that "...a Medicare beneficiary with chronic conditions is different from a young mom who brings her kids in for an annual check-up." This is market segmentation for beginners, and, yes, one size decidedly does not fit all. I'm sure your marketing team's been saying this for a while.

Steps 2-5: have a strategy, metrics, a champion and resources. OK. Hard to argue with any of those.

But those things, alone or together, won't overcome culture. They're important components to be sure, but insufficient without a …

The Answer For Lower Healthcare Costs Is...

...Customer Service.

From the New York Times: Seattle's Iora Primary Care is a new model of primary care, seeking national scale and venture capital funding.  Though the ambition may be outsize, the concepts are not new. Daily team huddles. Health coaches. Taking satisfaction surveys seriously and mining results for actionable insights. Employer and payer partnerships. Pay-for-performance not volumes. Loose-tight operations (wellness options are "loose" - i.e. varying from site to
site, while EHR alignment is "tight" and non-negotiable.)

According to the article:
"...small change(s) can make a big difference in a patient’s health — what good is the perfect drug if the patient can’t swallow it? — but the extra-mile work it took to get there can be a challenge for the typical primary care practice in the United States. Harried by busy schedules and paid on a piecework model, many doctors rush from visit to visit, avoid phone calls and emails that …