Skip to main content

Predictions for mHealth from David Doherty

Will mobile phones upset your thinking and upend your industry?  Maybe.  I'm working on a start-up idea for what I call "Consumer-controlled access to medical information" using Apple's iPhone as an authentication device.  David's forecast gives me some comfort I'm on the right track.

Some of the slides are hard to read, so here are the main predictions for how mobile phones will transform healthcare delivery in 2009

1.  mHealth will begin to supersede eHealth
2.  The Personal mHR will begin to replace eHR
3.  The Health Web Bubble won’t happen
4.  OLPC interest will shift to OMPC (One Mobile Per Child).
5.  SmartHome and Body Area Network initiatives will disappoint and focus will shift to mHome and Pervasive mTechnologies.
6.  A scientific paper will prove a mFitness application can offer greater Health benefits than regular gym use.
7.  Mobile Network Operators will start promoting Healthcare uses for Smartphones
8.  A 3G Video Calling service will be launched to serve patients in need of Medical Emergency Assistance.
9.  mHealth will drive the next phase of hardware convergence. 

mHealth Industry Predictions for 2009 by David Doherty, Business Development at 3G Doctor
View SlideShare presentation or Upload your own. (tags: persausion motivation)



Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
Hi Steve,

Thanks for sharing my thoughts here.

I hadn't realised the text would be illegible - i must go and upload it all...

Best wishes,

David Doherty
3G Doctor
January 6, 2009 at 7:12 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor
Post a Comment
Read more

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcare
Post a Comment
Read more

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer. In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers."  Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings. $2.4 billion saved
Post a Comment
Read more