Skip to main content

Drake University Gets A D+

These days it's easy to generate buzz.  Just do something stupid.

Drake University in Des Moines, IA set out to re-brand itself.  The result is over there to the left.  Apparently some faculty, students and alumni (read: donors) aren't impressed.  I don't blame them.

Drake officials refer to the campaign as "intentionally edgy" and seem quite sure that those who are "Drake material" will understand. 

Lest you think those of us NOT living in central Iowa are insufficiently edgy, we, too, get it.  Drake's name begins with a 'D' and adding the '+' sign is subtle and cool because Drake is a university with aspirations...what's not to get?

Maybe we're better at ignoring the "even bad publicity is better than none at all" crowd.   Had this controversy not erupted, it's entirely probable that Drake's name would never have appeared in this modest little blog.  So should we say 'mission accomplished?'  Nope.

All that "love me or hate me, just spell my name right" stuff begs a very important question:   

Deep down, at your organization's proud, mission-driven core, is the re-branded you really, well, YOU? 

Is it something of which you're able to be proud, today, tomorrow, three decades from now?  Or is it vanity-driven image for image's sake?  Edgy without substance or connection?

Some agency (Cedar Rapids-based Stamats, Inc in this case) went through the typical agency machinations - brainstorming, thinking deep thoughts, concepting, creating, developing options - and finished with "We really like THIS "D+" concept!  It'll get noticed and talked about!  It'll put you on the map!"  (Subplot: maybe even win US an award!)

And given the uproar, it's doubtful the concept was tested internally to any great extent, thus depriving the university of a wonderful opportunity to build pride and engagement among three very important constituencies.

Tossing aside a decades-old brand in favor of "edgy" is intellectually shallow if not downright shortsighted, don't you think?   Today's edgy is tomorrow's cringe-inducing.

Add Drake University to the list of organizations lacking the humble self-confidence to say "No. That's not us.  Try again, agency types.  We're better than that."

More here from AdFreak and The Huffington Post.

(Thanks to the Omaha World-Herald for the heads-up.)


Popular posts from this blog

Becoming Consumer Friendly In Five Easy Steps...Or Not

An article at offers hospitals 5 steps to becoming more consumer friendly.

If you still think there's a secret sauce to your hospital becoming more "consumer friendly," these 5 steps are as good a place to start as any.  Unfortunately, it's a little like that old Steve Martin comedy bit where he says he'll teach you how to be rich. The first step is to go find a million dollars.

Step 1 from the article is realizing that "...a Medicare beneficiary with chronic conditions is different from a young mom who brings her kids in for an annual check-up." This is market segmentation for beginners, and, yes, one size decidedly does not fit all. I'm sure your marketing team's been saying this for a while.

Steps 2-5: have a strategy, metrics, a champion and resources. OK. Hard to argue with any of those.

But those things, alone or together, won't overcome culture. They're important components to be sure, but insufficient without a …

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer.

In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers." 

Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings.

$2.4 billion saved from a p…

Another Day, Another App, Another Satisfied Customer

How might health care providers use technology to turn customers' mobile phones into information displays and ordering devices? A few years ago, the NY Times outlined how retailers are doing it...
"(Designer Norma) Kamali is at the forefront of a technological transformation coming to many of the nation’s retailers. They are determined to strengthen the link between their physical stores and the Web, and to use technology to make shopping easier for consumers and more lucrative for themselves.

Cisco Systems, the supplier of networking equipment and services for the Internet, is also a leader in the field. The company’s Mobile Concierge system is capable of connecting customers’ smartphones to retailers’ wireless networks — so a shopper could type “Cheez Whiz” into a cellphone, then pinpoint its location in the store." Ms. Kamali's boutique installed a technology called ScanLife, "allowing people to scan bar codes on merchandise and obtain details about the…