Skip to main content

Some Unhappy Math On Brand Value

In 2008 Business Week magazine ranked Toyota's brand 6th globally, pegging a brand value (in millions) of $34,050. The methodology - from branding consultancy Interbrand - uses several factors:
  • Calculating the percentage of a company's sales falling under a specific brand.
  • Determining the earnings derived from that specific brand's power by removing operating costs, taxes and capital charges from earnings. What's left is earnings derived from intangible assets - brand power but also patents and management strength.
  • Estimating the brand's effect relative to the other two and discounting future earnings produces an estimated net present "brand value."
How have Toyota's recent quality issues affected the brand?

Until recently many Toyotas in the $20,000-to-$25,000 price range sold for a premium over sticker of as much as $2,000. Now, as reported in today's Wall Street Journal, they're selling for $500 below invoice, or $2,000 below retail. And that's with an additional $1,000 rebate from the Toyota wholesaler.

That adds up to $5,000 in lost revenue: the foregone $2,000 premium, an additional $2,000 discount from normal retail and a $1,000 rebate. $5,000 "lost" on a $25,000 car, or twenty percent.

I'll not bore you with the NPV math (not remembering how to do it anyway...) but a back-of-the-envelope calculation of a twenty percent revenue hit for, say, six months is (in millions) about $3,500, dropping right to the bottom line. $3.5 billion in in earnings and intangible brand value...gone.

Brand math looks great on the upside, doesn't it? Marketers love it. Accountants may not like it but, heck, they don't like anything. Maybe because what looks great going up comes down with a vengeance. And as much as accountants hate adding brand value to the balance sheet, they like taking it off even less.


Popular posts from this blog

Behind Every Resume Is A Potential Customer...and Karma.

I recently heard from an executive colleague who, thanks to a merger, found herself looking for her next opportunity. Her story, probably depressingly familiar to many of you, was all about the big black hole of rudeness and non-responsiveness that so often sums up employers' attitudes toward candidates.

This colleague, thinking she'd see the healthcare world from a new vantage point, pursued opportunities with consultants, IT vendors, architects and other suppliers who, far from appreciating her solid resume, were like the 3 Stooges of clueless.

So back to a senior health system role she went, WHERE SHE NOW INITIATES AND MANAGES RFPs FOR SOME OF THE VERY SAME COMPANIES who wouldn't talk to her as a candidate, but profess their LOVE for her now that she's got money to spend on their services.

Not gonna happen. Any guesses who's off the RFP list?

I smiled when I heard her story, imagining the BusDev people working hard to grow the revenue pipeline, all the while b…

Becoming Consumer Friendly In Five Easy Steps...Or Not

An article at offers hospitals 5 steps to becoming more consumer friendly.

If you still think there's a secret sauce to your hospital becoming more "consumer friendly," these 5 steps are as good a place to start as any.  Unfortunately, it's a little like that old Steve Martin comedy bit where he says he'll teach you how to be rich. The first step is to go find a million dollars.

Step 1 from the article is realizing that "...a Medicare beneficiary with chronic conditions is different from a young mom who brings her kids in for an annual check-up." This is market segmentation for beginners, and, yes, one size decidedly does not fit all. I'm sure your marketing team's been saying this for a while.

Steps 2-5: have a strategy, metrics, a champion and resources. OK. Hard to argue with any of those.

But those things, alone or together, won't overcome culture. They're important components to be sure, but insufficient without a …

The Answer For Lower Healthcare Costs Is...

...Customer Service.

From the New York Times: Seattle's Iora Primary Care is a new model of primary care, seeking national scale and venture capital funding.  Though the ambition may be outsize, the concepts are not new. Daily team huddles. Health coaches. Taking satisfaction surveys seriously and mining results for actionable insights. Employer and payer partnerships. Pay-for-performance not volumes. Loose-tight operations (wellness options are "loose" - i.e. varying from site to
site, while EHR alignment is "tight" and non-negotiable.)

According to the article:
"...small change(s) can make a big difference in a patient’s health — what good is the perfect drug if the patient can’t swallow it? — but the extra-mile work it took to get there can be a challenge for the typical primary care practice in the United States. Harried by busy schedules and paid on a piecework model, many doctors rush from visit to visit, avoid phone calls and emails that …