Skip to main content

"Move Your Money" Responds To "Too Big To Fail But Not Too Proud To Be Bailed Out"

It's a great time to be an "economic carnage" observer and junkie. Between financial services' meltdown and Toyota's unintended acceleration, there's sufficient material for a lifetime of Tweets and blogs.

In this January, 2010 Health Care Strategist post for example, I predicted the financial services industry would begin to suffer, among other things, growing customer defections. I wrote of...
"...watching a real-time experiment in the consequences of pissing-off customers AND sticking them with the bill. Given enough time, and some credible options, customers act in all sorts of unexpected ways. Mostly, though, they just leave.

"It may take time to develop, but watch out for the coming disintermediation of financial services. Gone are the money center financial supermarkets. They may be "too big to fail" but that doesn't confer immunity from the hurricane of shifting customer loyalty. There's no such thing as "too big to be stupid."

"While the Feds worry about technical issues - mortgage-backed securities and other such ticking time bombs, bankers' worry ought to be more visceral: vanishing customer loyalty. Time bombs can be defused, given enough taxpayer money. But you can't "bail out" loyalty earned over decades and lost in the blink of a "crisis eye."'
Now a Huffington Post-inspired initiative called "Move Your Money" is encouraging consumers to flee money center banks in favor of local alternatives. Wait. I blog a prediction only to find someone already hard at work making it come true? I love it when that happens.

Case study-wise, it's an important lesson for industries (health care anyone?) sufficiently arrogant to think customers are locked in, that there's no substitute for what they offer. Or that their place in the food chain is so important as to be "destiny." Most dangerous of all is dismissing your critics as a bunch of progressive loons (which, on occasion, those at HuffPo can certainly be. That fact alone doesn't make their ideas any easier to dismiss.)

Today on CNBC, a Wall Streeter commented to the effect that "You may hate us now, but you need us to help you rebuild." Well, no, we don't actually. You're right about the hate, though.

"They need us! We're indispensable! Where else would they go?" Watch "Move Your Money" and learn.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcare

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer. In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers."  Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings. $2.4 billion saved