Skip to main content

Are You An Embarrassed Innovator?

If it takes a decade for you to learn something from another industry and apply it to your own health care organization, you should be issuing apologies for taking so long, not press releases.

I recently Facebook "friended" a certain west coast hospital (though not because they're doing anything interesting with social media. So far their Facebook presence is limited to shoveling press releases out the electronic door.) But my daughter works there and I figured it'd be a nice way to keep up with events in her life as a newly-minted RN.

Yesterday this hospital announced the opening of in-lobby registration kiosks, complete with a user's rave review. And there right in front of me, in 500 breathless words, was everything I find so frustrating about innovation in health care, a term that seemingly becomes more oxymoronic by the day.

Looking outside your industry is an excellent place to begin the search for innovative ideas. Good for them (or maybe their IT vendor.) Still, to the principles of innovation in health care, I'd propose adding the following codicil:
If you're announcing an 'innovation' today that the airline industry...the airline industry...the AIRLINE INDUSTRY FOR GOD'S SAKE accomplished 10 years ago...you owe apologies to the world's true innovators. And instead of earning kudos you may have people wondering 'what took you so long?'
When you've shortened that learning curve to, oh, 6 months we'll have something to discuss. And you'll have finally earned the right to call yourself 'innovative.'


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor
Post a Comment
Read more

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcare
Post a Comment
Read more

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer. In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers."  Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings. $2.4 billion saved
Post a Comment
Read more