Skip to main content

What Does The Future Look Like?

To see the future of facility design, I tell my hospital CEO friends, they should spend substantially more time in an Apple store than in some hospital lobby.

Why is it, do you think, that 30 minutes after a mall opens for business, the Apple store is packed and rocking while a dozen thrown bowling balls would not conk a single customer in the mall's more pedestrian stores?

And if YOU, dear health care leader, think you have nothing to learn from Apple's retail presence YOU'VE not been paying attention...or reading all the wrong blogs.  Now it's your problem to determine which. 

Can the ideas translate beyond Apple? We're about to find out as Ron Johnson, engineer of Apple's winning retail strategy, takes the CEO role at J.C. Penny's.

But translate as far as healthcare?  Egads!

At Apple, Johnson designed a "...retail experience that was consistent with the products and delivered lots of information. The focus was on discovery, entertainment, atmospherics and design. Apple had a one-trick pony that worked great."

Hmmm.  Let's think about this for a moment.  Discovery...entertainment...atmospherics...design.  Nah.  Nobody in health care wants THOSE things, do they?

People want to LEARN about their health?  The DISCOVERY journey matters?  Being ENTERTAINED along the way?  The DESIGN environment matters...a LOT?

With a Genius Bar staffed by scary-smart kids instead of sleepy volunteers?  (And I love volunteers, God Bless 'Em!  The problem is that too many hospitals throw them into the fray as essential, core customer service staffing when, if customer service matters at all, if it contributes to concrete bottom-line benefits, it should be FUNDED as if it does, not on the cheap.)

Geez.  If discovery, entertainment, atmospherics and design actually mattered, you'd think they'd be on the ACHE exam!

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor
Post a Comment
Read more

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcare
Post a Comment
Read more

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer. In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers."  Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings. $2.4 billion saved
Post a Comment
Read more