Skip to main content

Are Single-Specialty ACOs In Your Future?

AIS's Health Business Daily: "US Oncology May Go National With Private-Sector Accountable Care Organization."
"Leonard Kalman, M.D., who is one of several medical directors for the huge for-profit oncology practice-management firm and chairman of the board of managers of Miami-based Advanced Medical Specialties, says that he thinks US Oncology-affiliated practices as a whole, including his, are interested in exploring such commercial ACO-like ventures. In fact, he says, a major hospital in Miami has approached his 40-physician practice about handling cancer care in such a way. “Our ACO partner is a dominant hospital system where we put basically all of our patients,” he says, declining to name it.

"When cancer becomes the primary diagnosis, the oncologist basically handles the patient’s primary care, Kalman explains. “Remember, the majority of an oncology patient’s care is cancer care,” he says. So while ACO patients may require occasional care from other sources, including primary care physicians or specialists such as cardiologists or rheumatologists, only oncologists would be affiliated with a Medicare oncology ACO as he envisions it."
An intriguing idea, though I'm hearing echoes of mid-1990's style risk contracting where specialty carve-outs were common and, ultimately, counterproductive.   An "every specialty for himself" model, where the impetus is simply preserving market dominance and pricing power, further fragments care to nobody's benefit, least of all the patient's.  The more THAT happens, the more the entire system is put at risk.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor...

gapingvoid cartoon #378

Buy your own, here.

"An Affordable Fix For Modernizing Medical Records"

...from the Veterans Health Administration and Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital. I know enough about my own strengths and weaknesses to know that I'm no IT expert. But I am acutely interested in examples of people and teams thinking differently to solve long-standing, intractable problems and, for better or worse, there are lots of those to be found in the IT realm. Yesterday, it was a story about a team adding iPhone portability to MEDITECH functionality, delivering to harried physicians better access to clinical data and more productive hours in every work day. (Wow. Apple in the boardroom AND the physician lounge. Has to be an IT traditionalist's worst nightmare. But I digress...) Today, the Wall Street Journal features a story about Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital finding an affordable, open-source alternative to proprietary EMR systems : "In the push to digitize America's hospitals, Midland Memorial faced an all-too-common dilemma: a crying need for information ...