Skip to main content

Where's The Value?

We're coming up on an anniversary of sorts, an anniversary of the day I attended a charrette and nearly caused a riot.

See, I was representing my then-employer at a two-day planning retreat (also called a charrette) on the subject of building a statewide health information network, known generically as a CHIN or a RHIO. More than 100 leaders had gathered from hospitals, physician groups, payers, the ranks of tech and IT gurus and various levels of government, all with the purpose of moving the discussions from concept to something implementable.

As the festivities drew to a close, despite the group's best efforts, no compelling value proposition existed for the network. No statement of clear benefit emerged.  There was certainly no hint of how life could be improved for the end user (i.e. the patient.)  Even worse, the group's only funding plan consisted of the relatively few hospitals in the room each writing a big check.

Aspirations were running high.  Specifics were in desperately short supply.

At which point the local Blue Cross rep looked over at me and said "You know, if you hospitals would fund this system, we at Blue Cross could pay you sooner."

"You could pay us sooner NOW if you wanted to," I responded. "You just choose not to because you like money in YOUR bank account better than you like it in ours. A CHIN won't change that!"

Oops. If looks could kill I'd be writing this from whatever zip code contains Forest Lawn.  After some reflection, I could have been more judicious in my word choice, could have asked for more specifics on just how building a private-label version of the internet would accelerate hospital cash flow.  Woulda, coulda, shoulda.  I didn't.

But years later, several things are still clear as crystal:
  1. Health care's value propositions are frequently anything but.
  2. When you spend 2 days of 100 people's time trying to create a value proposition and FAIL, it's either bad facilitation or, maybe, there isn't any value to be created.  (And I might add that on this particular day the facilitators (not me) were pretty good.)
  3. Given half a chance and lots of someone else's money, groups will do their best to reinvent the wheel, or, in this case, the internet.
  4. Large doses of hospital funding won't change #1 or #2 and will only worsen #3.
  5. Suspicion is the correct stance when a payer wants a hospital to spend lots of money so they, the payer, can do their job promptly and correctly.
So say it proudly;

Charrettes are cool!
CHINs are neat!
But when value leads,
Your day is complete!

Thanks for reading.  Join the conversation.  Leave a comment.  Spark an argument.  Send me a message (healthcarestrategist@gmail.com)  And about Blue Cross?  I'm still right.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcare

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer. In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers."  Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings. $2.4 billion saved