Skip to main content

Small Is Beautiful

How do you grow?  A critical question for health systems, communities, policy makers and incubators alike.   Writing in Bloomberg Business Week, Vivek Wadhwa argues that nurturing a few tiny companies is a better bet than what he calls misguided "behemoth-centric policies."

"Established companies are job destroyers..." says Wadhwa, citing research from the Kauffman Foundation finding big companies erasing 1 million jobs per year from 1977 to 2005.  Maybe there's a better way...
"...the Kauffman Foundation's Robert Litan just published Inventive Billion Dollar Firms: A Faster Way to Grow. It's a succinct argument that suggests helping a few really innovative startups become big businesses. How many? Maybe less than 60."
Read the article, review the fairly compelling math.  And notice that Kauffman puts its money where its mouth is, with an initiative called Kauffman Labs For Enterprise Creation targeting promising industry sectors and entrepreneurs ready to change the world.

Could your health system benefit from a "Lab For Enterprise Creation" and like-minded entrepreneurs?  Are you exhausted by cardio/ortho/neuro/oncology/EMR/private beds' near-infinite capital appetite and diminishing growth prospects?

Stop trying to feed the monster - at least to the exclusion of everything else.   Try letting 60 flowers bloom.  Find a few people in your organization itching to change the world.  Don't believe you have any?  You haven't looked very hard.

Another riff on Getting Big By Going Small, from Strategy+Business and biotech CEO Francois Nader.

Maybe you can get 'small' by assessing all your possessions' true value.  Try moving.  You really can't take it with you.

Sometimes what you subtract is more important than what you add.  Everyone should get "small" by having a stop-doing list.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor...

gapingvoid cartoon #378

Buy your own, here.

"An Affordable Fix For Modernizing Medical Records"

...from the Veterans Health Administration and Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital. I know enough about my own strengths and weaknesses to know that I'm no IT expert. But I am acutely interested in examples of people and teams thinking differently to solve long-standing, intractable problems and, for better or worse, there are lots of those to be found in the IT realm. Yesterday, it was a story about a team adding iPhone portability to MEDITECH functionality, delivering to harried physicians better access to clinical data and more productive hours in every work day. (Wow. Apple in the boardroom AND the physician lounge. Has to be an IT traditionalist's worst nightmare. But I digress...) Today, the Wall Street Journal features a story about Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital finding an affordable, open-source alternative to proprietary EMR systems : "In the push to digitize America's hospitals, Midland Memorial faced an all-too-common dilemma: a crying need for information ...