Skip to main content

How Close To Insanity Is Healthcare Strategy?

“Strategic insanity is doing the same things as everybody else and expecting better results.” (A paraphrase of Albert Einstein.)


A recent Harvard Business Review article talked about overcoming hidden cognitive limitations.  “Strategic leaders must be practitioner psychologists who expertly analyze and manage their own and others’ thought processes…identifying successful strategies that are different, unique and distant from the status quo.”

Amen.  But not always a comfortable place to be is it?  Telling your organization that thought processes need to change, that they're outdated and predictable.   That the status quo should be avoided because of its limitations, not prized for its stability.


So the job of a strategist is to reframe thought processes and mental models.  

Let's do a deep dive into the weeds of health care thinking and modeling to see what shakes out.  And let's assume that you, dear reader, are serious about creating “strategic separation." About growing faster than the market. About delivering visibly better quality and customer satisfaction. Setting the EBITDA pace with each fiscal year.

You’re serious?   Good.  And yet, compared to everyone else, you…
  • Attend the same seminars as thousands of your peers, sponsored by the same organizations.
  • Read the same magazines.
  • Buy the same clunky IT systems from the same IT vendors. Sign the same contracts, embark on the same installation processes while letting the vendor escape anything resembling accountability for their kludgy system actually WORKING as designed.
  • Hire the same architects who build yet another “light-filled lobby” and for whom “innovation” means adding a waterfall.
  • Benchmark against other hospitals - ideally your competitor up the street, the competitor from which you're trying to SEPARATE.
  • Purchase the same shiny radiology gadgets and robots from the same vendors.
  • Buy syndicated market research, technology forecasts and packaged advice from the same think tanks and advisory boards.  You learn the same things your competitor does, at the very same time.  Great.  That'll help. 
  • Use the same state-supplied data systems to generate the same market share statistics to formulate more-or-less identical growth strategies. You’re growing cardiology? How unique! 
  • Hire one of a few pedigreed consultants to put pretty ribbons on it all.  "Our board wants someone with a pedigree to explain the future. (As if the future cared about pedigrees!)
  • Offer indistinguishable ad campaigns featuring undistinguished messages. “We care!” “We have a shiny new robot!” We’re a big system with lots of doctors and locations!” 
  • Strip the pathos and promise from vision statements, then compensate with “Pillars” because, as we all know, lack of employee engagement is just about terminology.
  • Oh right, you’re using the same 5 pillars as everybody else. Hard thinking outside of some consultant’s box, isn’t it?  "Quality, service, growth...  Yeah, but you're really sincere" 
  • Talk about “branding” as if the word has even passing relevance to organizations more comfortable being one among many instead of standing alone above the few.
So.  Do the same things as everybody else and expect better results.

Why?

Maybe you’re smarter? Better-looking? Harder-working?  Maybe you’re really sincere and they’re…not?  You communicate better, your troops really, really like you, like you better than their troops like them.  Umm-hmm.

To think outside the box you must first DESTROY the box!

Stay tuned. More tomorrow.

(By the way, I'm not sure how many times I used the word 'same' in this post.  A big shout-out if you can tell me.)

Comments

S said…
Using the words "healthcare" and "strategy" in the same sentence is often oxymoronic. It is far past time to change it up.
Crister said…
But... but... radiology gadgets are shiny and pretty. All joking aside, this is a great post. I think anyone who has ever worked for a hospital and believed in the "mission" of the organization at some point gets jaded. It all becomes talking points and similar formulas, just boxed differently. You're so right... throw out the box.

But when that box is (red)-taped up (yes, pun intended) with things as archaic as: making docs happy, internal politics, nepotism, "this is how we've always done it" mentality - things that need to be "reshaped in the though process, what do you do? Heck, it'll take a decade just to educate those people! Who wouldn't die of frustration?! Yes, there are those rare C-suite execs who aren't afraid to lead the charge in unknown territories, but those are few and far between.

Maybe instead of the box being thrown out, those red-tape items need to be thrown IN it.

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcare

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer. In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers."  Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings. $2.4 billion saved