Skip to main content

Close The Deal! It's NOT That Hard!

What do you say to a business, trying to gain new customers in a struggling part of the economy, that shoots off its own foot? I generally like The Wall Street Journal. Like it enough, in fact, that I thought I'd subscribe for a year. I'm not thinking that any more.

I receive The Journal's regular direct mail solicitations offering a year's subscription for about $100. Their web site offers a slightly higher rate, though still heavily discounted from normal. But since I live in what can be charitably called "The Boonies" I called their toll-free number to make sure daily home delivery is available. It is.

"What's your best rate for a one-year subscription?" I asked? I was quoted a rate nearer to $400 than $100. Apparently the lower rates are available ONLY to those signing up on-line.

Hmmm. So The Journal's direct mail team spent all that effort convincing me to subscribe - wasted effort, as it turned out, when the call center team didn't empower an operator to offer me a deal identical to those gracing my mailbox every other week.


I can understand cost-conscious organizations wanting to serve customer needs via the web whenever possible. Makes sense to me, especially when it's an integral part of a well-crafted customer service strategy.


But c'mon people! Think about it! No wonder the newspaper business is in trouble. THEY HAD ME ON THE PHONE, credit card at the ready! And couldn't close the deal.

They better not whine about how tough the economy is right now.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcare

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer. In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers."  Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings. $2.4 billion saved