Skip to main content

What's Over the Horizon?

Help your over-the-horizon foresight by paying attention to trends in the venture capital and start-up communities. To get you thinking, check out the links down a ways in the right sidebar, under the "Emerging Companies" header.

Here for example, from OneMedPlace's Med Tech Sentinel blog,
you can read about developments in treating drug-resistant TB, a huge benefit for the estimated one-third of the world's population already infected, and innovations in mitral valve repair, offering less-invasive treatment options for thousands.

Nascent ideas, both, but two more "what if's...?" for health care strategists to plug into their models and begin asking the right questions, like...
  • How can we monitor these ideas and others like them?
  • When could the idea reach maximum impact?
  • What does the idea replace or substitute for?
  • Are there partnership opportunities for early adopters?
  • What might this mean for our brand, our physicians and our patients?
  • Are there other ways to reap the ideas' maximum benefits?
Remember too, as a strategist, it's not important to produce "precisely right" answers, nor is it even possible to do so much of the time. It's more important that you facilitate the right organizational conversations - conversations that lead to shared foresight and a range of "...if this happens, we need to be prepared to do that..." scenarios.

Fun stuff!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcare

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer. In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers."  Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings. $2.4 billion saved