Skip to main content

Trends In Retail Medicine

Sg2's Bill Woodson on trends in retail medicine: (free registration required)
"The very crowded and diverse market that is Chicago seems likely to embrace many models of primary care including retail clinics, urgent care centers, home monitoring programs, e-visits, the "medical home," concierge practices, federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), and the corporate clinic.

"Indeed, 5 years from now we will look back and note that this moment in health care was marked not by the "retail clinic" but by the aggregation and disaggregation of different value streams. In short, we are starting to adopt different models of channel management that have marked the evolution of every other part of our economy. What in the world does that mean? It means that we are finding opportunities to stick things together and pull things apart in ways that add value for different types of customers. The retail clinic, the e-consult, the cancer nurse navigator—and bundled payment, for that matter—are all part of the same Erector Set of health care 2.0 that we desperately need to chase cost, waste and substandard care out of our bloated system. And yes, finding the right set of incentives for our overworked primary care physicians is a big part of the solution."
I'd add another forecast to Woodson's: health systems will turn retail clinics into "customer service centers" offering a suite of convenient, consumer-friendly services; centralized scheduling, registration and insurance verification, pre-admission testing, health information and physician referrals, all offered by a team of employees heavily incentivized to establish new patient/customer relationships. It wouldn't take much - a desk or two, maybe, and the right attitudes.

It's sort of the WaMu approach to retail health care...only without the fraudulent lending practices.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcare

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer. In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers."  Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings. $2.4 billion saved