Skip to main content

"...Major League Middle Class Anxiety."

Knowledge@Wharton reports on a panel discussion about the prospects for health care reform.
"...a statistical backdrop for the panel's discussion: 42 million Americans uninsured, another 40 million under-insured, about 16% of the nation's GDP spent on health care. "Health insurance now costs 17% of family income," ... up from about 7% in the early 1990s... Despite all those dollars, though, "a third of what we spend on health care right now adds no value."
It's that last statement that gets me. Though I agree the system contains huge amounts of slop, I'm also acutely aware that one person's "non-value-added spending" is the next person's - or lobbyist's - income. No medical pun intended, but the the streets'll be slick with blood before that debate is finished.

And here, futurist Joe Flowers echoes my "...in crisis comes opportunity.." mantra, advising that "The path out of crisis is the path to the future."
"If there ever was a time to demonstrate value, to get your costs down and quality up at the same time, to get a firm hold on your processes, this is it. The economic crisis will force us all to look for the low-hanging fruit. And indeed, organizations that have seriously embraced “lean production” systems and the like routinely show improvements of 50 percent or more in their key metrics."
Strategists need to keep their organizations focused on the challenges of identifying, improving and delivering value to customers and the marketplace. And yes, along the way someone's ox will be gored. Hence the blood.

We waste one-third of our health care dollars, yet improvements of 50 percent or more in key metrics are there for the taking by anybody smart enough to learn and deploy a few powerful, simple techniques. And we're waiting for...what?


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor
Post a Comment
Read more

"An Affordable Fix For Modernizing Medical Records"

...from the Veterans Health Administration and Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital. I know enough about my own strengths and weaknesses to know that I'm no IT expert. But I am acutely interested in examples of people and teams thinking differently to solve long-standing, intractable problems and, for better or worse, there are lots of those to be found in the IT realm. Yesterday, it was a story about a team adding iPhone portability to MEDITECH functionality, delivering to harried physicians better access to clinical data and more productive hours in every work day. (Wow. Apple in the boardroom AND the physician lounge. Has to be an IT traditionalist's worst nightmare. But I digress...) Today, the Wall Street Journal features a story about Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital finding an affordable, open-source alternative to proprietary EMR systems : "In the push to digitize America's hospitals, Midland Memorial faced an all-too-common dilemma: a crying need for information
3 comments
Read more

Are the "Apocaholics" Wrong?

Will society avoid collapse and continue prospering? Yes, thanks to the innovators among us says zoologist and Economist editor Matt Ridley in his new book "The Rational Optimist." "...with new hubs of innovation emerging elsewhere, and with ideas spreading faster than ever on the Internet, (expect) bottom-up innovators to prevail. (Ridley's) prediction for the rest of the century: “Prosperity spreads, technology progresses, poverty declines, disease retreats, fecundity falls, happiness increases, violence atrophies, freedom grows, knowledge flourishes, the environment improves and wilderness expands.” We could still screw things up.  We could, for example, stifle innovation and trade while inflating the importance of restrictive bureaucracies. "Our progress is unsustainable...only if we stifle innovation and trade, the way China and other empires did in the past. Is that possible? Well, European countries are already banning technologies based on the preca
2 comments
Read more