Skip to main content

I'm No Genius But I Love A Bar














I hear health care providers talk about wanting to get better at retail. They should do themselves - and their customers - a favor and spend an hour in the nearest Apple store.
















This is Oak Brook, IL, last week. The day was warm yet the heat was blasting, so the doors were open to the plaza, lending fresh air and a blast of Milanese Euro-cool to what is already a pretty cool place.

Most striking sight: a woman hurrying for her lesson at the Genius Bar, lugging her MacBrook Pro in a Tiffany jewelry bag. That's Oak Brook for you.
















And the Genius Bar is itself pretty cool.
What could you, dear health care leader, do with a Genius Bar in your lobby? You think health care consumers might benefit from a place where smart people solve problems, troubleshoot, offer advice? You think your "reception desk" does that? Trust me, if you do, you haven't been in an Apple store and seen the possibilities.

I purchased a $19.95 printer cable. The helpful staffer scanned both the package and my credit card, looked up my e-mail address in their customer database, e-mailed me a receipt and printed out an additional copy, all in about 20 seconds, on a device roughly the size of an iPhone. No lines, no waiting, no "...you pay over there so go stand in THAT line..," no customer service handoffs at all. Bingo, bango, done, out the door.

Next time I go back it's to buy a 24" iMac and an iPhone and 4 new iPods for Christmas presents. Yes, I drink Apple's Kool-Aid. You don't have to imbibe to appreciate the relevance of Apple's branding and retail strategies to your own quest for customer connection.

So tell your boss you're spending an afternoon doing some work-related shopping. You won't be lying...for once.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcare

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer. In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers."  Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings. $2.4 billion saved