Skip to main content

I'm No Genius But I Love A Bar














I hear health care providers talk about wanting to get better at retail. They should do themselves - and their customers - a favor and spend an hour in the nearest Apple store.
















This is Oak Brook, IL, last week. The day was warm yet the heat was blasting, so the doors were open to the plaza, lending fresh air and a blast of Milanese Euro-cool to what is already a pretty cool place.

Most striking sight: a woman hurrying for her lesson at the Genius Bar, lugging her MacBrook Pro in a Tiffany jewelry bag. That's Oak Brook for you.
















And the Genius Bar is itself pretty cool.
What could you, dear health care leader, do with a Genius Bar in your lobby? You think health care consumers might benefit from a place where smart people solve problems, troubleshoot, offer advice? You think your "reception desk" does that? Trust me, if you do, you haven't been in an Apple store and seen the possibilities.

I purchased a $19.95 printer cable. The helpful staffer scanned both the package and my credit card, looked up my e-mail address in their customer database, e-mailed me a receipt and printed out an additional copy, all in about 20 seconds, on a device roughly the size of an iPhone. No lines, no waiting, no "...you pay over there so go stand in THAT line..," no customer service handoffs at all. Bingo, bango, done, out the door.

Next time I go back it's to buy a 24" iMac and an iPhone and 4 new iPods for Christmas presents. Yes, I drink Apple's Kool-Aid. You don't have to imbibe to appreciate the relevance of Apple's branding and retail strategies to your own quest for customer connection.

So tell your boss you're spending an afternoon doing some work-related shopping. You won't be lying...for once.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor

"An Affordable Fix For Modernizing Medical Records"

...from the Veterans Health Administration and Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital. I know enough about my own strengths and weaknesses to know that I'm no IT expert. But I am acutely interested in examples of people and teams thinking differently to solve long-standing, intractable problems and, for better or worse, there are lots of those to be found in the IT realm. Yesterday, it was a story about a team adding iPhone portability to MEDITECH functionality, delivering to harried physicians better access to clinical data and more productive hours in every work day. (Wow. Apple in the boardroom AND the physician lounge. Has to be an IT traditionalist's worst nightmare. But I digress...) Today, the Wall Street Journal features a story about Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital finding an affordable, open-source alternative to proprietary EMR systems : "In the push to digitize America's hospitals, Midland Memorial faced an all-too-common dilemma: a crying need for information

Are the "Apocaholics" Wrong?

Will society avoid collapse and continue prospering? Yes, thanks to the innovators among us says zoologist and Economist editor Matt Ridley in his new book "The Rational Optimist." "...with new hubs of innovation emerging elsewhere, and with ideas spreading faster than ever on the Internet, (expect) bottom-up innovators to prevail. (Ridley's) prediction for the rest of the century: “Prosperity spreads, technology progresses, poverty declines, disease retreats, fecundity falls, happiness increases, violence atrophies, freedom grows, knowledge flourishes, the environment improves and wilderness expands.” We could still screw things up.  We could, for example, stifle innovation and trade while inflating the importance of restrictive bureaucracies. "Our progress is unsustainable...only if we stifle innovation and trade, the way China and other empires did in the past. Is that possible? Well, European countries are already banning technologies based on the preca