Skip to main content

Eschew Obfuscation

What? Keep it simple, in other words.

Health care providers spend lots of time and money convincing their customers to care about complexity. They fail, usually. Customers don't care about organizational complexity. They refuse to add someone else's problems to their own. And they'll never care about all the ways providers shoot themselves in the proverbial foot, layering complexity upon disorder on top of inward-focused decision-making.

Like big signs everywhere, proclaiming that, in most cases, your physicians are really not YOUR physicians but merely independent contractors needing a place to sit while charting. Signs that say (not so) subtly "...nyah nyah, don't sue us because you won't get anywhere!" Quite a welcome. Thank you, lawyers everywhere.

Or like health care's powerful and omnipresent "guilds" insisting that it be called "pathology" when most customers still look for "the lab." Or "diagnostic imaging" instead of "x-ray." And how is "health information management" different from "information technology" and where the hell do I go for copies of my MEDICAL RECORD?

Busy staff walk right past those signs, thousands of times a day, seeing nothing wrong. Maybe they think the puzzled customers clogging the hallways are really just resting. Some hospitals mask the complexity by adopting an "everybody escorts" philosophy, where employees are expected to physically guide lost customers to their destination. Laudable, but where's the root cause analysis here? Maybe it's not the customers who're lost.

Enough buzzwords, enough title-creep for people and departments, enough trying to explain what's unnecessary and inexplicable. Where's the discernible boost to competitiveness? What's been accomplished except customer confusion and more high-falutin' titles for careerist staff? Where's the recognition that complexity is expensive, confusing and darn unhelpful in any organization's quest for strategic separation?

Stop trying to explain complexity and start getting rid of it.

I'm still waiting for some brave hospital CEO to discover "truth in labelling" and substitute "ANSWERS" for the "reception desk" (a funeral home term if there ever was one...) and "butts and guts" for "gastroenterology." Just kidding on that last one. Maybe.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor

Being Disrupted Ain't Fun. Deal With It.

Articles about disrupting healthcare, particularly those analogizing, say, Tesla's example with healthcare's current state, are frequently met with a chorus of (paraphrasing here) "Irrelevant! Cars are easy, healthcare is hard." You know, patients and doctors as examples of "information asymmetry" and all that. Well, let me ask you this: assuming you drive a car with a traditional internal combustion engine, how much do you know about the metallurgy in your car's engine block? I'll bet the answer is: virtually nothing. In fact it's probably less than you know about your own body's GI tract. Yet somehow, every day, us (allegedly) ignorant people buy and drive cars without help from a cadre of experts. Most of us do so and live happily ever after (at least until the warranty expires. Warranties...another thing healthcare could learn from Tesla.) Now, us free range dummies - impatient with information asymmetry - are storming healthcare

My Take On Anthem-Cigna, Big Dumb Companies and the Executives Who Run Them

After last Friday's Appeals Court decision, Anthem's hostile takeover of, er, merger with Cigna has but a faint pulse. Good. Unplug the respirator. Cigna's figured it out but Anthem is like that late-late horror show where the corpse refuses to die. Meanwhile, 150 McKinsey consultants are on standby for post-merger "integration" support. I guess "no deal, no paycheck..." is powerfully motivating to keep the patient alive a while longer. In court, Anthem argued that assembling a $54 billion behemoth is a necessary precondition to sparking all manner of wondrous innovations and delivering $2.4 billion in efficiencies. The basic argument appears to be "We need to double in size to grow a brain. And just imagine all those savings translating directly into lower premiums for employers and consumers."  Stop. Read that paragraph again. Ignore the dubious "lower premiums" argument and focus on the deal's savings. $2.4 billion saved