Skip to main content

We Finished In Last Place So...

...after firing everyone responsible, we're designing a new logo.

Yep, that'll work.

THE TAKEAWAY: Whatever your organization's problems, they weren't caused by your logo. Whatever the solutions, a new logo is usually an expensive, unnecessary distraction.

Are you going to drink more Pepsi or Pepsi products now that the logo has morphed into some weird emoticon?

Were I Pepsi's marketing guru, I would have found a way to distribute Gatorade Endurance Formula to stores, well, ANYWHERE, thus pleasing us triathletes who think their current eye-dropper-like distribution strategy is resoundingly idiotic.

And raise your hand if you think the Detroit Lions' new logo will pull them out of last place. Or make their fans forget 2008. Oh, I know, it's part of the revival of a great brand, bringing new passion and energy...blah blah.

Heck, I call myself a "brand-builder" and even I don't believe that stuff. Brands are not logos and symbols, they're simply what organizations are willing to - and capable of - delivering.

Don't believe me? Consider the Chicago Blackhawks, one of hockey's original six teams. After more than a decade of utter futility on and off the ice left a fan base with barely a pulse, they're now thriving in the playoffs and filling the United Center with roaring, capacity crowds. New leadership. New attitudes. New players. Same logo.

So save your money. Sell stuff. Get some players.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor
Post a Comment
Read more

"An Affordable Fix For Modernizing Medical Records"

...from the Veterans Health Administration and Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital. I know enough about my own strengths and weaknesses to know that I'm no IT expert. But I am acutely interested in examples of people and teams thinking differently to solve long-standing, intractable problems and, for better or worse, there are lots of those to be found in the IT realm. Yesterday, it was a story about a team adding iPhone portability to MEDITECH functionality, delivering to harried physicians better access to clinical data and more productive hours in every work day. (Wow. Apple in the boardroom AND the physician lounge. Has to be an IT traditionalist's worst nightmare. But I digress...) Today, the Wall Street Journal features a story about Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital finding an affordable, open-source alternative to proprietary EMR systems : "In the push to digitize America's hospitals, Midland Memorial faced an all-too-common dilemma: a crying need for information
3 comments
Read more

Are the "Apocaholics" Wrong?

Will society avoid collapse and continue prospering? Yes, thanks to the innovators among us says zoologist and Economist editor Matt Ridley in his new book "The Rational Optimist." "...with new hubs of innovation emerging elsewhere, and with ideas spreading faster than ever on the Internet, (expect) bottom-up innovators to prevail. (Ridley's) prediction for the rest of the century: “Prosperity spreads, technology progresses, poverty declines, disease retreats, fecundity falls, happiness increases, violence atrophies, freedom grows, knowledge flourishes, the environment improves and wilderness expands.” We could still screw things up.  We could, for example, stifle innovation and trade while inflating the importance of restrictive bureaucracies. "Our progress is unsustainable...only if we stifle innovation and trade, the way China and other empires did in the past. Is that possible? Well, European countries are already banning technologies based on the preca
2 comments
Read more