Skip to main content

What's Your Share of Customer?

THE TAKEAWAY: A Share of Customer analysis is easy to do (with the help of an actuary) and may just point the way to significant, overlooked revenue opportunities.

Take 20,000 random accounts from your revenue files. To each account, append the appropriate demographic variables, diagnosis and treatment codes, and the charges for it all. Bundle it up into a suitably-scrubbed data file (so as to avoid the HIPAA police) and send it off to your favorite actuary.

Ask the actuary to estimate the total charges of that 20,000 person cohort (i.e. how much they’re estimated to spend ANYWHERE on all types of health care) and your “Share of Customer” (i.e. how much of that total they spent with you.)

Reporting on my first SoC analysis, the actuary pronounced that we were the beneficiary of roughly 86% of the cohort’s estimated total spending on inpatient and outpatient care. I didn’t think that was too bad. We were leaving a few million dollars on the table but there’s always things like out-of-area, tertiary and trauma care to consider.

Notably, our market area contained a number of snowbirds who gleefully left us behind as the snow fell and didn’t return ‘til it quit six months later. Their health care spending during that fun-in-the-sun was not really amenable to being redirected back to us no matter how many times we plowed the sidewalks.

And, as a community hospital system, we didn’t perform some tertiary-level services like transplants or heavy-duty trauma care. But now at least we knew what we were leaving on the table - by not competing for it in some cases, and not wanting to compete for it in others.

The actuary’s report continued: “You’re getting very little of their estimated pharmacy spending, and virtually none of their spending on complementary and alternative medicine.” Hmmm. Right there were two revenue streams, each between $5 and $10 million per year, that we weren’t competing for at all. Not at all. Hadn’t thought about it.

Did we WANT to compete? Ah, there’s a question. Both opportunities posed certain challenges - logistical, legal and supply chain challenges in the case of pharmacy revenues, and long-standing medical staff resistance to anything smacking of CAM. Did we have the core competencies and innate patient loyalty to compete with Walgreen’s and CVS? How many pints of blood should we reserve for those debating with the medical staff over, say, acupuncture?

That’s a bad pun and a good question. But now we’d learned the value of having those discussions and the costs of leaving barriers in place: possibly $20 million a year in lost revenues. Everybody - even a hospital CEO - has a threshold where the motivation to do SOMETHING powers through the inertia to leave well enough alone.

And this was for a suburban system of fairly modest size. How many bigger opportunities do YOU have? Add a SoC analysis to the analytical work you’re already doing on market share. It may be good for your opportunities list.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor

"An Affordable Fix For Modernizing Medical Records"

...from the Veterans Health Administration and Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital. I know enough about my own strengths and weaknesses to know that I'm no IT expert. But I am acutely interested in examples of people and teams thinking differently to solve long-standing, intractable problems and, for better or worse, there are lots of those to be found in the IT realm. Yesterday, it was a story about a team adding iPhone portability to MEDITECH functionality, delivering to harried physicians better access to clinical data and more productive hours in every work day. (Wow. Apple in the boardroom AND the physician lounge. Has to be an IT traditionalist's worst nightmare. But I digress...) Today, the Wall Street Journal features a story about Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital finding an affordable, open-source alternative to proprietary EMR systems : "In the push to digitize America's hospitals, Midland Memorial faced an all-too-common dilemma: a crying need for information

Are the "Apocaholics" Wrong?

Will society avoid collapse and continue prospering? Yes, thanks to the innovators among us says zoologist and Economist editor Matt Ridley in his new book "The Rational Optimist." "...with new hubs of innovation emerging elsewhere, and with ideas spreading faster than ever on the Internet, (expect) bottom-up innovators to prevail. (Ridley's) prediction for the rest of the century: “Prosperity spreads, technology progresses, poverty declines, disease retreats, fecundity falls, happiness increases, violence atrophies, freedom grows, knowledge flourishes, the environment improves and wilderness expands.” We could still screw things up.  We could, for example, stifle innovation and trade while inflating the importance of restrictive bureaucracies. "Our progress is unsustainable...only if we stifle innovation and trade, the way China and other empires did in the past. Is that possible? Well, European countries are already banning technologies based on the preca