Skip to main content

The Math Of Healthcare Value

"ACOs are about improving health outcomes. 1990s style managed care was about reducing utilization."

I ran across that statement yesterday, exactly where I can't remember. I think the author is right about the different emphases but wrong to imply the terms 'outcomes' and 'utilization' could be mutually exclusive.  Doing so misses the point - which is, then and now, all about VALUE.

Let's define Value as:  [What we GET / What we PAY].

What do we GET from health care?  Outcomes. Results. Better health.  Longer lives.  Pain relief.

What do we PAY?  In total, it's [how many x how much], or [utilization multiplied by unit costs].

So,

Value = [What we get / What we pay].

Or,

Value = [Outcomes / (utilization x unit costs)]

Maximizing value - getting more and/or paying less - requires focusing on all of the equation's elements - outcomes, utilization and unit costs.   Yes, the 1995 response to Hillarycare might have been utilization-driven, and the current response to Obamacare more outcomes-focused, but they're really just parts of the same value-improving imperative.

And so value-driven health care leaders focus on delivering better results using fewer and lower-cost resources.  The math is easy.  The rest is not.

What's YOUR value proposition?  Is it better today than a year ago?  How do you know?  How good will you need to be in five years?  What rate of improvement does that imply?  Contact me (Steve Davis) if I can assist.  (healthcarestrategist@gmail.com)

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor...
Post a Comment
Read more

gapingvoid cartoon #378

Buy your own, here.
Post a Comment
Read more

"An Affordable Fix For Modernizing Medical Records"

...from the Veterans Health Administration and Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital. I know enough about my own strengths and weaknesses to know that I'm no IT expert. But I am acutely interested in examples of people and teams thinking differently to solve long-standing, intractable problems and, for better or worse, there are lots of those to be found in the IT realm. Yesterday, it was a story about a team adding iPhone portability to MEDITECH functionality, delivering to harried physicians better access to clinical data and more productive hours in every work day. (Wow. Apple in the boardroom AND the physician lounge. Has to be an IT traditionalist's worst nightmare. But I digress...) Today, the Wall Street Journal features a story about Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital finding an affordable, open-source alternative to proprietary EMR systems : "In the push to digitize America's hospitals, Midland Memorial faced an all-too-common dilemma: a crying need for information ...
3 comments
Read more