More from the New York Times on radiation safety (or the lack thereof.) This time it's Evanston (IL) Hospital and problems involving three patients during identical stereotactic radiosurgery procedures. Investigators found problems that should have been obvious to the rankest six sigma newbie. Poorly-designed trays and mounts that interfere with an operator's ability to verify settings. The need to "trick" the machine into thinking it was doing one thing when it was really doing something far more dangerous. Complex components from multiple vendors, all kludged together. Moving data from one computer to another and then to a third, each hand-off a failure waiting to happen. Says the article; "(The) system is supposed to work this way: A treatment plan is developed on one computer, then transferred into another software system that, among other things, verifies that the treatment plan matches the doctor’s prescription. The data is then sen...
“The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet.” (William Gibson)