Skip to main content

Big Money = Big Project = Big Success! Right? Wrong!

In a funny and thoughtful TED video, ad man Rory Sutherland says many flashy, expensive fixes are just obscuring better, simpler answers. To illustrate, he uses behavioral economics and hilarious examples.

Sutherland's premise:  "...large organizations have actually become completely disconnected with what actually matters to people."  And "...our sense of self-aggrandizement (demands) that big important problems need to have big, important and expensive solutions attached to them."

Sound familiar?  A hospital spends $100 million on a new bed tower because "patients demand private rooms."  Well, of course they do.  What other options did you give them?

It's axiomatic that someone given $100 million to solve a problem will solve it quite differently from someone given only $1 million.  And, depressingly, there's absolutely no guarantee that the expensive fix will be the most effective.

If you want to know how to better serve Medicaid patients, don't ask a rich, suburban hospital.  They'll just give you the big-money, big suburban hospital answer.  Big money and, likely, wrong.  No, ask Chicago's Mount Sinai.  If, like GE, you're selling $100k diagnostic machines, where do you find out how to sell machines just as capable for $5,000?  Rural India of course. 

By the way, I love his riff on why Accenture dumped Tiger Woods, when most of Woods' transgressions seemed to perfectly fit Accenture's 'outsource and multi-task' advice model.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor...

gapingvoid cartoon #378

Buy your own, here.

"An Affordable Fix For Modernizing Medical Records"

...from the Veterans Health Administration and Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital. I know enough about my own strengths and weaknesses to know that I'm no IT expert. But I am acutely interested in examples of people and teams thinking differently to solve long-standing, intractable problems and, for better or worse, there are lots of those to be found in the IT realm. Yesterday, it was a story about a team adding iPhone portability to MEDITECH functionality, delivering to harried physicians better access to clinical data and more productive hours in every work day. (Wow. Apple in the boardroom AND the physician lounge. Has to be an IT traditionalist's worst nightmare. But I digress...) Today, the Wall Street Journal features a story about Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital finding an affordable, open-source alternative to proprietary EMR systems : "In the push to digitize America's hospitals, Midland Memorial faced an all-too-common dilemma: a crying need for information ...