Skip to main content

Ditching 'Chevy' Puts 'Chevrolet' In the Ditch

From The New York Times:  A new ad agency got involved and now memos are flying asking that employees call it 'Chevrolet' not 'Chevy.'  "...though the (latter) is one of the world’s best-known, longest-lived product nicknames."
“We’d ask that whether you’re talking to a dealer, reviewing dealer advertising, or speaking with friends and family, that you communicate our brand as Chevrolet moving forward,” said the memo, which was signed by Alan Batey, vice president for Chevrolet sales and service, and Jim Campbell, the G.M. division’s vice president for marketing.


“When you look at the most recognized brands throughout the world, such as Coke (sic) or Apple for instance, one of the things they all focus on is the consistency of their branding,” the memo said. “Why is this consistency so important? The more consistent a brand becomes, the more prominent and recognizable it is with the consumer.”
Batey and Campbell are right about employees acting as brand ambassadors and the benefits of consistency, but wrong about most everything else.  You WANT consumers making your brand their own. You WANT consumers talking about you with easy familiarity.  You WANT names becoming deeply rooted in vivid imagery and shared meaning.  You'd LOVE it if that name endured for generations.

Wouldn't you?

“Once it became an American icon, America took (the name) away from G.M.”  says one Chevy loyalist.

To me that's the heart of successful branding, not a failure in need of correcting.  Of course it's a success the new agency didn't produce and can't bill for.  And account executives are seldom promoted for telling clients to leave well enough alone.

Sometimes I wonder if brand strategists possess an ounce of self-awareness about how foolish they sound much of the time.  And given GM's recent history, they're lucky they're being talked about at all.   This is a memo begging to be ignored.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor...

Simplicity From Complexity

Health care planners typically juggle many different services and businesses, each with unique customers, competitors and prospects.  The complexity can be overwhelming.  So-called portfolio models for assessing industry attractiveness and competitive strength can be a good analytical jumping-off point, including the McKinsey-GE 9-box matrix . (Click on the "Launch Interactive" link.)

5 Marketing Megatrends

Coming to a brand near you, from Adam Kleinberg at iMedia Connection, here are " 5 marketing megatrends you can't ignore ." Mass collaboration... Constant connectivity... Globalization... Pervasive distrust in big corporations... A global sense of urgency... #4 is, I think, under-appreciated in health care. Doctors and hospitals like to think of themselves as the last of the white hat-wearing good guys, and maybe they are. But trust is a funny thing - built over decades and lost overnight. Screw it up and watch the laser beam of populist rage move from Wall Street to Medical Avenue.