Skip to main content

We Love You. Now Go Home.

Do you remember the movie featuring a horror hotel described as easy to check into but difficult to leave...alive?  Expect a remake someday, but with a hospital setting.

Improving post-discharge care and avoiding preventable readmissions is the subject of an article in  today's New York Times, finding that the process is often rushed, chaotic and uncoordinated.
"Hospitals tend to focus their efforts on the admissions process, because that’s when the patient is most sick,” said Dr. Mark V. Williams, one of the authors of the (NEJM) study. “The discharge process can be just as important but rarely gets the same level of attention.”
Dr. Williams is right about the focus but wrong about the reason - which has little to do with the severity of the patient's illness.  In determining why hospitals focus where they do, a good rule of thumb is always follow the money.

Where does it lead?  Right to the admitting process, so critical to determining what a hospital is paid for its labors (if anything.)   And that's where financially-stressed, revenue cycle-obsessed hospitals will focus until something else matters more.

Need a new focus? You'll need new schemes with incentives for rewarding VALUE delivered during and after the inpatient stay.  No more upfront 'pay per click" but after-the-fact 'Pay for value at 30 days post-discharge.' 

Change the money flow and, like a re-focused laser beam, watch hospitals STOP asking at admission "Will we get paid?" and START asking at discharge "Did we do this patient any good and how do we maintain the clinical momentum?"

In short, make the discharge process matter to PAYMENT and watch it matter to HOSPITALS.

By the way, this is my 400th post.  Thanks for reading!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Porter On Health Care Reform

Michael Porter, writing in the New England Journal of Medicine, proposes "A Strategy For Health Care Reform - Toward A Value-Based System." His proposals are fundamental, lucid and right-on, meaning they're sure to be opposed by some parties to the debate, the so-called "Yes, but..." crowd. Most important, in my opinion, is this: "... electronic medical records will enable value improvement, but only if they support integrated care and outcome measurement. Simply automating current delivery practices will be a hugely expensive exercise in futility. Among our highest near-term priorities is to finalize and then continuously update health information technology (HIT) standards that include precise data definitions (for diagnoses and treatments, for example), an architecture for aggregating data for each patient over time and across providers, and protocols for seamless communication among systems. "Finally, consumers must become much mor...

gapingvoid cartoon #378

Buy your own, here.

"An Affordable Fix For Modernizing Medical Records"

...from the Veterans Health Administration and Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital. I know enough about my own strengths and weaknesses to know that I'm no IT expert. But I am acutely interested in examples of people and teams thinking differently to solve long-standing, intractable problems and, for better or worse, there are lots of those to be found in the IT realm. Yesterday, it was a story about a team adding iPhone portability to MEDITECH functionality, delivering to harried physicians better access to clinical data and more productive hours in every work day. (Wow. Apple in the boardroom AND the physician lounge. Has to be an IT traditionalist's worst nightmare. But I digress...) Today, the Wall Street Journal features a story about Midland (TX) Memorial Hospital finding an affordable, open-source alternative to proprietary EMR systems : "In the push to digitize America's hospitals, Midland Memorial faced an all-too-common dilemma: a crying need for information ...